VisitBrief

Staff preparing for a visit have to read several short documents and notice what is already recorded, what is missing, and what conflicts. VisitBrief keeps that judgment with the person. It is built for clinical staff, not for a patient looking for advice, and it prepares a draft from an allowlisted fictional chart. The staff member picks one of twenty built-in cases. There is no file upload and no free-form prompt, so the demo cannot accept a real patient record. One to three text PDFs are split into pages and source blocks. DeepSeek-V4-Flash on AMD Token Factory returns candidate facts. Radeon Cloud states that these catalog models run on AMD GPUs. The API keeps a fact only when its quote is inside the block it cites. If the model paraphrases a value, the screen shows the quote instead. Wording that is not in the assigned block is dropped and is not repeated. Duplicates are merged. A date that is not in the quote is cleared, so undated facts stay off the timeline. Two recorded doses of the same medicine are shown side by side and are not reconciled. A sentence that tells the model to ignore instructions or invent a diagnosis is dropped, and the case is flagged. Missing allergy documentation stays a review flag, not a finding of no allergies. The screen counts candidates that were kept, repaired, or dropped, and it labels the result as a draft for clinician review. There is no database. Request logs do not store document text. Held-out cases were not used to change the prompt. One pass on 15 October recalled 27 of 58 curated development facts (46.6 percent) and 34 of 43 held-out facts (79.1 percent).